thebigquestions.com
проверил в wolframalpha — и правда =/
проверил в wolframalpha — и правда =/
полущ чем nnoremap <leader><space> :noh<cr> будет
scienceblogs.com
The Objective-Caml bytecode interpreter was faster than the carefully hand-optimized C program! Why? Because the OCaml compiler could recognize that the arrays were completely independent — it didn't need to worry about one iteration of the loop stepping on the values used by another. The C compiler couldn't apply a lot of useful optimizations, because it couldn't be sure that they were valid.
а что разве в современных компиляторах нет никаких костылей, чтобы помогать компилятору понимать такие вещи?
The "C is Efficient" Language Fallacy The Objective-Caml bytecode interpreter was faster than the carefully hand-optimized C program! Why? Because the OCaml compiler could recognize that the arrays were completely independent — it didn't need to worry about one iteration of the loop stepping on the values used by another. The C compiler couldn't apply a lot of useful optimizations, because it couldn't be sure that they were valid.
а что разве в современных компиляторах нет никаких костылей, чтобы помогать компилятору понимать такие вещи?
gist.github.com ехал лямбда через лямбда